Saturday, February 2, 2019

An Argument for Euthanasia Essay -- Argumentative Essays, Persuasive Es

An Argument for EuthanasiaEuthanasia is defined as, The cause or practice of putting to death painlessly a or sobody suffering from an incurable disease. Euthanasia can be traced back as far back as the ancient Greek and Roman civilizations. It was sometimes allowed in these civilizations to help others die. Voluntary euthanasia was approved in these ancient societies. Today, the practice of euthanasia causes great controversy. Both pro-life groups and undecomposed-to-die groups present telephone circuits for their polar sides. Pro-life groups make arguments and present fears against euthanasia. I contend that the case for the right to die is the stronger argument. I will begin my by listing the arguments against euthanasia and my criticism of each argument. 1. Euthanasia is a violation of medical ethics. The American Medical Association has consistently condemned euthanasia as an unethical practice. Today, attitudes may be changing. Recent surveys indicate that a majority of d octors in some areas, (60% in Oregon, 56% in Michigan, and 54% in Great Britain.) opt euthanasia in extreme cases. 2. Euthanasia weakens the trust relationship among the doctor and the patient. We expect doctors to heal and save lives, not to kill. I detect that I should be able to trust my doctor to do what is trump for me as an individual in any situation, including ending unbearable suffering, even if it is my choice to die in order to end my suffering. Doctors may mislay the trust of their patients by not helping them to end their suffering. 3. Choosing the time and plaza of a individual?s death is God?s decision. This argument suggests that we should never intervene in any life-threatening situation. If a person is having a heart attack, should we just... ...admit that they have given heavy doses of morphine to usurp the extreme pain of terminally ill patients, knowing that such(prenominal) spunky doses will cause a quicker death. Because their primary aim is to bea r pain, these acts are considered moral. It would not be morally right to give the like high doses of morphine if their primary aim was to cause death. This is in my persuasion wrong. In either case, the ultimate end is death. I believe that it is scandalous of society to force caring, compassionate people to lie and go to such morbid lengths to help their patients and loved ones end their suffering. These illegal acts would be only when unnecessary if euthanasia were regulated and legalized. Value Premise Everyone deserves to live a life free from suffering.Factual Premise Euthanasia ends suffering.Conclusion In order to end suffering euthanasia should be allowed.

No comments:

Post a Comment